How do you challenge without creating misalignment?

Alignment vs Challenge

When I left the Royal Marines, one of the biggest differences I noticed between the military and civilian world is the understanding of the difference between challenge and alignment. So I thought I’d share a view to help clarify the issue…

Being challenging is important. When an issue or a decision is being discussed, you should challenge. You should give your honest opinion on whether you think the idea is good or bad or the decision is the right or wrong one.

This is the opportunity to influence the decision that is being made. It should be done away from the eyes and ears of your team because it is inappropriate for people to hear disagreements amongst leaders.

However, the moment that the decision has been made – the challenging behaviour stops.

When you leave the room, you need to be able to go back to your team and share the decision or idea with them as if you came up with it yourself.

If they challenge you on whether this is the right thing to do – you need to be able to deal with that challenge as if it was your own idea. If they get the sense that you’re not happy with the decision or you don’t agree with the plan, it will breed misalignment because they will get the sense that you don’t believe that it is the right thing to do. It will also undermine the success of your organisation by undermining your leadership.

When we are debating an issue, loyalty means giving me your honest opinion, whether you think I’ll like it or not. Disagreement, at this stage, stimulates me. But once a decision has been made, the debate ends. From that point on, loyalty means executing the decision as if it were your own.                  

Colin Powell

Colin Powell puts it well. The difference between challenge and alignment is all about the timing. Once the decision has been made, loyalty means ‘selling the plan’ to your team as if you came up with it yourself.

The whole process of making decisions can be made much easier if you have three things in place.

Purpose – Mission – Vision

1. Purpose

A purpose explains why the business/team exists. This is the underlying motive for why we are here. We use it to make sure that we attract people who are inspired and want to be a part of the higher cause that we are committing ourselves to. I wrote about this last week explaining how NATO ‘lock in’ a purpose to everything they do.

2. Mission

The mission is simply ‘what do you do and for whom’. It can be stated as ‘we do X for Y’. We provide (the following service or product) for (these people). This creates clarity around your target market or customers – whoever benefits from your service. If you don’t have this, how can you spot the difference between an opportunity and a distraction?

Everyone wants to get into tech, and I understand that because the industry is taking off and lots of people are making a lot of money in this area. But an app, for example, can cost around £150k so for many companies represents a significant investment.

Does it benefit the people that you serve? How do you know unless you have a clearly articulated mission? If you want your people to share good ideas that advance your organisation, a mission is helpful in clarifying the boundaries for them.

3. Vision

The last element is the vision. This is simply a statement which dictates where you are going. It should be simple, clear and to the point. If it tries to be ‘too much’ it ends up meaning nothing.

What does your vision look like? Where is your organisation going? If you want to know how well your vision is understood, ask your people.

If you ask five people and get five answers that are the same, your vision is simple enough to inform people’s decision-making. If you get five different answers, then it isn’t and by definition you will be suffering from an alignment problem.

When I started working at Urenco – the vision for the business was complex because it had too much detail. By the time I left, it had been simplified and was much clearer. I can remember it now ‘ Zero-One-Zero’.

Zero-Harm – ‘Everyone leaves the site in good health’

100% customer delivery – ‘Every order on spec, on time, in full’

Zero Unplanned Outages – ‘No unexpected plant breakdowns’

When you think about it, this captured the important messages – the three things that mattered. Safety – Customer Focus – Maintenance. If we stuck to those three priorities then we’d be successful as an organisation.

If you have a purpose, a mission and a vision – you make it easier for the organisation to align in one direction. You remove the opportunities for waste by creating boundaries and helping people focus on what is important.

Leaders create environments where people can be successful. These are the foundations for that success and they are why we decided to make them the foundations of the High Performance Leadership Programme.

Related Insights

RodYapp-Swivel-Sept2023-236

The Junior Officers’ Resettlement Guide

The Junior Officers’ Resettlement Guide was first written in July 2012 when Matt and I left the Royal Marines. We wanted to create some handover notes that would help Lieutenants/Captains leave the UK Military and transition into a successful second career. We have received some very positive feedback since then so thought it might be helpful…

josh-hild-jdTdvF6fDus-unsplash

Stop Plan and Implement – Start Experiment and Learn

I have been taught that in order to achieve something you have to have a clear goal and a plan to get from A to B. This has worked for the majority of goals I have set over the course of my life. It was the approach I used when I applied to join the Corps and the one I used to plan my career. But I am starting to challenge this assumption based on recent events and what I have learnt over the past couple of years.

coasteering-ymrlecRNbs8-unsplash

The Danger of Blindly Trusting the Data

It was just after midnight on 26 September 1983, Stanislav Petrov, poured himself another cup of coffee and sat back in his chair in front of series of bulky computer screens. He was preparing himself for another night on duty in the Serpukhov-15 bunker just outside of Moscow. His responsibilities included the monitoring of the early warning satellite system which warned the Soviet Union of an impending nuclear missile attack.