4 Lessons Private Equity Leaders Can Learn from Boeing’s Leadership Failures

In the early 2010s, Boeing was locked in a fierce commercial dogfight. Airbus had just launched the A320neo, a sleek, fuel-efficient aircraft that sent shockwaves through the airline industry. The response from customers was immediate and emphatic—billions of dollars in orders poured in, leaving Boeing scrambling to respond.

Airbus A320 on the runway

Time was the enemy. Designing an entirely new aircraft would take a decade and risk losing market share that might never be recovered. So Boeing chose speed: rather than building a new plane, they would retrofit their most successful model—the 737—with larger, more efficient engines and a few software tweaks.

Boeing 737 Max on the runway

On paper, it made sense. The 737 MAX would be cheaper to produce, faster to launch, and easier to sell—especially if pilots didn’t need extra training. To achieve that, Boeing added a flight control system called MCAS (Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System). It was meant to be invisible. No extra cost. No fuss. Just plug and play.

But MCAS wasn’t benign. It relied on a single sensor to detect nose angle, and if that sensor failed—as it did on two commercial flights—the system could force the plane into a dive that pilots weren’t trained to recover from. That’s exactly what happened.

In October 2018, Lion Air Flight 610 crashed into the Java Sea, killing all 189 people onboard. Five months later, Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 met the same fate, claiming 157 more lives. In both cases, MCAS was implicated. The 737 MAX was grounded worldwide. Boeing’s reputation—built over a century—was shattered in weeks.

Investigations would later reveal a series of compounding failures: internal concerns ignored, safety risks underplayed, regulatory approvals fast-tracked, and a board that lacked the technical expertise to challenge any of it. What began as a strategic shortcut became a global scandal.

And it didn’t need to happen.

For leaders in private equity—where pace, pressure, and performance are part of the job—there are important lessons here. Not just about aviation, but about the risks that emerge when execution outpaces oversight, and performance metrics replace principle.

1. Don’t Let Speed Undermine Judgment

Boeing moved quickly because it had to. But in doing so, it took a high-risk decision—retrofitting old architecture—and treated it like a low-risk solution. The cultural belief that “we don’t have time for this” can infect decision-making under pressure.

PE Lesson: Execution matters, but unquestioned momentum is dangerous. If your portfolio company is accelerating hard, make sure the fundamentals are still being challenged. Momentum should never substitute for due diligence.

2. The Real Cost of Oversimplification

MCAS was positioned as a minor addition—so minor, in fact, that it wasn’t disclosed in training materials. That decision was commercially motivated: less training meant faster sales. But omitting that detail stripped pilots of critical context and removed a vital safety net.

PE Lesson: Simplification helps scale, but oversimplification is a red flag. If a critical system, process, or product is being positioned as “plug and play,” ask: What are we assuming away? Complexity doesn’t disappear because it’s inconvenient.

3. Boards Must Be More Than Cheerleaders

Boeing’s board included decorated CEOs, former ambassadors, and military leaders—but very few with aerospace or engineering expertise. When executives presented timelines and risk assessments, there was no one in the room with the technical grounding to challenge them meaningfully.

PE Lesson: The role of the board is not just to guide strategy—it’s to challenge assumptions. Especially in technically complex or highly regulated sectors, domain expertise in the boardroom isn’t optional—it’s essential.

4. Culture is a Strategic Variable

Boeing’s culture had shifted over the years—from engineering excellence to quarterly performance. Internal concerns raised by engineers were routinely downplayed or ignored. As pressure to deliver mounted, the internal narrative hardened: stay on schedule, stay quiet.

PE Lesson: Culture is easy to ignore—until it becomes a liability. In high-performance environments, especially where turnaround is the mandate, you must create psychological safety for dissent. If bad news isn’t surfacing, that is the news.

Final Thought: Leadership is a Long Game

The Boeing crisis didn’t happen because a single person failed. It happened because an entire system—pressured by competition, driven by cost, and protected by complacency—failed to ask the hard questions in time.

Private equity leaders face similar conditions: urgency, transformation, and expectations to deliver. But leadership isn’t just about speed and scale—it’s about clarity, courage, and consequence.

The next time you’re in a boardroom making a decision that feels too good to question, ask yourself: Are we building a legacy, or just hitting a number?

Because the answer matters. Especially when everything is on the line.


Related Insights

jukan-tateisi-bJhT_8nbUA0-unsplash

How do you challenge without creating misalignment?

Alignment vs Challenge When I left the Royal Marines, one of the biggest differences I noticed between the military and civilian world is the understanding of the difference between challenge and alignment. So I thought I’d share a view to help clarify the issue… Being challenging is important. When an issue or a decision is being discussed,…

kenny-eliason-2RRq1BHPq4E-unsplash

Six Thinking Errors – Which one is Yours?

There are six common thinking errors that people suffer from. These are examples of negative mental models that people have. I describe them as negative because they usually lead to a behaviour or a feeling that we don’t want. If you can understand them and watch out for the ones that you suffer from, you…

charlesdeluvio-Lks7vei-eAg-unsplash

Why High Performers Struggle with Feedback

Challenge and feedback are both valuable but often difficult to receive. Why? How can something that is good for you generate a negative emotional reaction? Challenge reminds us that there are many ways in which we can view the world. It reminds us that there are other perspectives out there rather than just our own.…